Hello guys, today i'd like to share you some gaps between the first journal article i have reviewed and the second journal article i was reading. The topic is about analyzing the weaknesses and the strengths of those two articles. But what i've done is analyzing it slightly. So, this is not a deep analyzing (pardon me). This is probably will be the shortest blog i've ever made.
I really enjoy reading my first journal article about the experiment of using two viewing techniques in applying a video. I feel like i could understand the first journal article more than the second one eventhough both of them already have sentence structures and vocabularies that are not really complicated to me.
I really like the method section of the first journal article i've read, the authors really explained it clearly. It shows when the authors divide the section method into three parts which are participants, video materials, and the procedure of doing their research.
The method of the second journal article i was reading is not quite clear to me, because i don't really know is there any aspect that determined the author to choose the material of her research.
What i really like about the second journal is that the author provides the reader to know what the materials she used to find its result. Moreover, the author also elaborated them in the finding and discussion section of the article effectively.
Sadly, neither of them tell the reader how to apply the benefit of their research in the classroom specifically.
I think that's all for today's blog. See you in another blog, guys!
Komentar
Posting Komentar